TO THE TRUTH I NEVER KNEW, NOW I CAN MAKE IT WITHOUT YOU

HAPPY MONDAY!

Firstly, thank you so much for taking this journey with me to find out more about livestock production and the impacts we are making through unconscious everyday decisions. I enjoyed writing this blog much more than I expected, and I am so thankful for having the chance to give it a go. Whilst you may have learnt a lot from this blog, it has been a learning curve for me too, and I've constantly been growing as I learn more about the information I'm digging out.

Although this is the end of my Geography assessment, but I would really appreciate it if you left me any comments with your thoughts and if you have any great website links for me to learn even more! I would LOVE to read it!

So, into the nitty gritty stuff, I'm going to just briefly outline the main solutions to the meat problem.

1. Government

The government needs to find ways to discourage major producers from rearing livestock near city areas through either zoning, taxes or incentives. For example, in Thailand, there are high taxes on poultry production within a 100km radius of Bangkok. This has been effective in reducing poultry production near Bangkok.

2. Waste management

Use manure as a fertiliser rather than polluting waters.

3. You

Become as vegetarian/vegan as you possibly can. “Eat meat, but less often — make it special,” Mark Sutton, lead author of a U.N. Environment Programme 2013 study on meat consumption, said. “Portion size is key. Many portions are too big, more than you want to eat. Think about a change of culture that says, ‘I like the taste, but I don’t need so much of it.’”

I want to leave you with something very important that I have learnt through this journey with you.

Understand that you, as a consumer, have a level of social responsibility. What you spend your money on is the key to change (by altering demand, it can alter supply).

Mooney says "If they are informed that they do have choices to help build a  more sustainable and equitable world, they can make better choices."

Finally, a quick reminder of the serious extent of animals slaughtered just for the plate on your table.

You've been such amazing readers every Monday, I really hope you're able to join my Meatless Mondays, whether I have a new post every Monday or not! To make me very happy, please sign the Meatless Monday pledge!!

http://www.meatlessmonday.com/pledge-to-go-meatless/

WELL, MAYBE THERE ARE ULTERIOR MOTIVES TO TURNING VEGETARIAN...

On a lighthearted note... 

9 Reasons why Vegetarians Make Awesome Girlfriends

MAYBE WE'RE WRONG? NITROUS OXIDE DEBATE

Nitrous oxide is about 300 times more potent as a global warming gas than carbon dioxide. According to the U.N., the meat, egg, and dairy industries account for a staggering 65 percent of worldwide nitrous oxide emissions.

Nitrous oxide has been pinpointed as third most important contributor to global warming. Extensive research shows that large quantities of nitrous oxide is emitted as a result of livestock. This is evident in numerous scientific literature such as in the Soil Biology and Biochemistry journal, page 597, 'Nitrous Oxide Emissions from soils due to inputs of nitrogen from excreta returned by livestock on grazed grassland in the UK.'

There are also very detailed explanations on the N₂O emission calculations for each component of livestock production systems, i.e. animal houses, manure stores, following application of manures to land and during grazing in 'Atmospheric Environment', under 'A UK inventory of nitrous oxide emissions from farmed livestock'. If you are interested in the statistics related to each of these stages in the livestock production, head over HERE!

Naturally, nitrous oxide is emitted. This can be seen in the nitrogen cycle as shown below:

The actual nitrous oxide is emitted through feed production and the management of the manure. The former occurs due to the nitrogen based fertilisers used in the soil which leads to nitrous oxide releasing in the atmosphere.

According to new research however, Professor Klaus Butterbach-Bahl from the Atmospheric Environmental Research Division of the KIT Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research (IMK-IFU) in Garmisch-Partenkirchen said, 'this was a big error'.

Founded by scientists from the Atmospheric Environmental Research Division of the KIT Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, studies in China show that livestock breeding does not lead to an increase in nitrous oxide. “In fact, areas not used for livestock breeding emit much larger amounts of nitrous oxide over the year.” 

The website also states that nitrous oxide emissions have been overestimated by 72%.

Supported by the 'Nature study' shows evidence pointing towards the link between grazing and the reduction in nitrous oxide emissions in some areas. 

Despite this opposing view on whether livestock is the root cause of nitrous oxide emissions or not, increasing nitrous oxide in the atmosphere is still a fact, and nitrous oxide is being emitted due to human-related agricultural factors.

Furthermore, Authors of the paper, published in Nature, say the research does not mean that producing livestock to eat is good for the environment in all countries. However in certain circumstances, it can be better for global warming to let animals graze on grassland.

What do you think?

Happy Meatless Monday! Tune in next Monday for a new post on Water Usage

AN OPEN LETTER TO THE "FOODIES"

Dear "Foodies",

We met at a fast food restaurant, a friend's house, in a convenience store, wherever, you chose me, out of an array of colourful options.

You took pride in the 100+ likes you gained on Instagram from photos with me. 

You devoured every moment with me, because I was there when you were lonely, and I was there when you had a great night with your best friends. I've seen you in all your glory, celebrations for passing your exams, crying over the friend who betrayed you, and being sick on your bathroom floor after a night out. 

So it began like that. I set out to lure you in, and now you're determined for more.

Ultimately, I'm so glad I'm the latest trend. Because quite frankly, people used to neglect us quite a bit.

A sincere thank you, for choosing me.

I look foward to seeing you very soon,
Your favourite,

MOUTHWATERING JUICY BURGER (with extra mature cheddar cheese, gherkins, extra layer of meat, jalapeno, mushrooms, pickles, tomato sauce, mayonnaise, mustard, lettuce, tomatoes, caramelised onions, chilli, spinach, bacon, fried egg, and more cheese, with my dear friend, fries and the handful of salad that no one seems to touch.)

---------------------

Having been taken by storm with the burger boom, with over 3million posts with the hashtag #burger on Instagram up to date, humans are craving every type of burger out there in every corner of the globe.  This is evident by just searching the term 'burger' in Google Trends, which portrays the ever increasing interest in burgers and its popularity in a variety of countries.

Global production of meat is forecasted to more than double from 229 million tonnes in 1999/01 to 465 million tonnes in 2050. The environmental impact per unit of livestock production must be cut by half, just to avoid increasing the level of damage beyond its present level.


With entrepreneurs taking this opportunity to exploit this trend, crazy burger ideas have been brought to the market, such as the 'Glamburger' costing an arm and a leg (in other words, £1,100) in Chelsea, in exchange for the most extravagant ingredients which include black truffle, Himalayan salt and a gold leaf.

Ultimately, "burgers are culinary survivors: They can adapt no matter where mainstream tastes flow." The burger trend can evolve in ways to ensure its survival with new trendy ingredients.

After this introduction, you may be seduced by the idea of reaching for a big juicy burger whilst you finish reading this post, perhaps its worth stopping for a minute to realise the real value of what you're eating.

Yes, we've been there, taught that. Burgers (and pizza, chips, soda bla bla bla) are bad for your health, don't eat them. Well, we all thought we're old enough to deal with what we put into our bodies, and lets face it, all this controversy is only applicable to small kids who can't control themselves.

Wrong.

In the traditional sense, yes, burgers are bad for you. Too much fat, sodium and whatnot.

But on a macro level, eating burgers (and meat in general for that matter) is harming the earth. How so, you ask.

A report from the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) cited livestock production as "one of the top two or three most significant contributors to the most serious environmental problems, at every scale from local to global." 

"The environmental damage by the livestock sector goes far beyond the sector; it also goes beyond agriculture."

DID YOU KNOW? 

Livestock production accounts for 18% of global greenhouse gas emissions; more than the world's cars and SUV's combined.

When put into perspective, those juicy addictive burgers are no longer just a health risk but a risk to the world. 

The consumption of meat is a huge interest to me personally, as I have always lived under the impression that a bit of meat is good for the body and have never thought twice about how it could be harmful to the environment. Being a 'good human' (if I should say so myself), recycling where possible, walking instead of driving a car and even keeping food waste as compost made me think I was putting in more than my two cents, surely! After reading more on meat consumption, I have become intrigued in the scientific journals that point to the harmful effects on the planet.

Throughout this blog, I will be providing more information regarding meat consumption, its impacts and potential effects on global warming and other environmental impacts as a consequence of meat production. 

Make sure to come back to check for the latest posts!

Happy Meatless Monday!

Tune in next Monday for a new post on the origins of the meat trend!